Home › Power rankings › Challenger Pro League
Challenger Pro League power rankings 2026/27
As of 17 October 2026, SK Beveren lead the Challenger Pro League by Elo rating (2004), ahead of Union St. Gilloise (1907). Patro Eisden have gained the most over the last seven days (+48).
| Rank | Club | Elo | 7 days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SK Beveren | 2004 | – |
| 2 | Union St. Gilloise | 1907 | – |
| 3 | Dender | 1809 | – |
| 4 | RAAL La Louvière | 1790 | – |
| 5 | Beerschot VA | 1766 | – |
| 6 | KV Mechelen | 1694 | – |
| 7 | AS Eupen | 1689 | – |
| 8 | Zulte Waregem | 1678 | – |
| 9 | Cercle Brugge | 1657 | – |
| 10 | Kortrijk | 1623 | – |
| 11 | KVC Westerlo | 1576 | – |
| 12 | Lommel United | 1562 | – |
| 13 | Lokeren-Temse | 1529 | – |
| 14 | K. Lierse S.K. | 1521 | – |
| 15 | Sporting Hasselt | 1516 | – |
| 16 | Francs Borains | 1490 | – |
| 17 | Oostende | 1474 | – |
| 18 | KAA Gent II | 1474 | +30 |
| 19 | Excelsior Virton | 1462 | – |
| 20 | Roeselare | 1451 | – |
| 21 | RWDM | 1442 | – |
| 22 | Club Brugge II | 1435 | – |
| 23 | Liège | 1431 | – |
| 24 | Patro Eisden | 1421 | +48 |
| 25 | Lierse | 1384 | – |
| 26 | Deinze | 1376 | – |
| 27 | KRC Genk II | 1369 | −47 |
| 28 | OH Leuven | 1348 | – |
| 29 | Seraing United | 1317 | −29 |
| 30 | Royal Excel Mouscron | 1262 | – |
| 31 | Lokeren | 1259 | – |
| 32 | Tubize | 1241 | – |
| 33 | RSC Anderlecht II | 1235 | – |
| 34 | Standard Liège II | 1169 | – |
| 35 | Olympic Charleroi | 1128 | – |
Challenger Pro League fixtures, free picks and the table: Challenger Pro League predictions
Elo is a strength rating: it moves after every result by how surprising the result was. It is a measure of strength now, not a prediction of the final table — the predicted table is that. How the ratings work: the methodology.
Use this table: the CSV (free to use with a credit to TACTIX) · embed it:
<iframe src="https://tactix.football/embed/power-rankings/challenger-pro-league" width="340" height="360" loading="lazy" style="border:0;max-width:100%" title="Challenger Pro League power rankings"></iframe>