Chicago Fire v New England Revolution result
Team pages: Chicago Fire · New England Revolution · Head-to-head
The model’s pre-match pick
Chicago Fire 1–2 New England Revolution — New England Revolution won this Major League Soccer match. TACTIX’s pre-match model pick was Over 2.5 goals.
The result
New England Revolution won 2–1 at Soldier Field in Major League Soccer on Sunday 13 September.
Chicago Fire have scored in 15 consecutive matches — every result checked.
The goals
New England Revolution led 1–0 at half-time. The goals — New England Revolution: Dor Turgeman (39’, assisted by Jackson Yueill) and Peyton Miller (47’, assisted by Dor Turgeman); Chicago Fire: M. Haile-Selassie (62’, assisted by R. Lod).
How it turned
Replaying TACTIX’s published pre-match model through the match’s three key moments (goals and red cards), the biggest swing came with Dor Turgeman’s goal on 39 minutes.
The numbers
Expected goals (xG) tell a different story: Chicago Fire out-shot New England Revolution 22 to 4 and created the better chances, 1.92 xG to 1.53 (the provider’s expected goals for this match).
Discipline
R. Vazquez showed four yellow cards — against 3.9 yellows a game across the last 15 matches refereed (this competition). The bookings — Chicago Fire: N. Allen (43’) and S. Oregel (84’); New England Revolution: M. Polster (52’) and Peyton Miller (58’).
What it changes
Chicago Fire are winless in their last six matches.
New England Revolution have scored in seven consecutive matches.
It is New England Revolution’s first win over Chicago Fire since 5 May 2024, after three meetings without one (the 6 prior meetings TACTIX holds).
Who stood out
By TACTIX Impact for this match, M. Haile-Selassie (Chicago Fire) 7.7, Dor Turgeman (New England Revolution) 7.0 and Peyton Miller (New England Revolution) 6.2 led the match.
What the model said
The model’s free pick, Over 2.5 goals, landed — graded in the live track record like every other call.
Next up
Chicago Fire next travel to Atlanta United FC on 24 October 2026.
New England Revolution next travel to Philadelphia Union on 24 October 2026.
Written from the matches TACTIX holds for both sides; each figure names the games it is counted over.
Next for Chicago Fire: Atlanta United FC v Chicago Fire, Sunday 25 October — the preview. Next for New England Revolution: Philadelphia Union v New England Revolution, Sunday 25 October — the preview.
The numbers
- Result: Chicago Fire 1–2 New England Revolution · Major League Soccer
- Venue: Soldier Field · Chicago
- Referee: R. Vazquez
- Model coverage: 246 markets priced for this fixture
- Head-to-head (last 6): Chicago Fire 2 · draws 3 · New England Revolution 1 · 3.33 goals/game
- Recent form: Chicago Fire 0W 4D 1L · New England Revolution 3W 1D 1L
Chicago Fire 1–2 New England Revolution (Major League Soccer): this fixture is settled. TACTIX’s pre-match coverage ran across 246 markets, and every graded call — wins and losses — is in the live track record (as of 27 September 2026). See the live track record →
Key stats
Per game, last 8 completed matches, to 10 September 2026. Over/under figures use standard thresholds, not bookmaker lines.
| Per game | Chicago Fire for / against | Line | New England Revolution for / against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.88 for · 1.63 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.25our book | 1.63 for · 1.38 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Corners won | 3.13 for · 4.38 against n 8 Last 5 | 9.5standard | 5.5 for · 5 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots | 11.13 for · 15 against n 8 Last 5 | 19.5standard | 17.25 for · 11.38 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots on target | 5 for · 5.13 against n 8 Last 5 | 8.5standard | 6.38 for · 4.25 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Fouls committed | 11.63 for · 10.75 against n 8 Last 5 | 21.5standard | 7.88 for · 10.63 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Cards shown | 2 for · 1.88 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.5standard | 1.38 for · 1.13 against n 8 Last 5 |
Referee: R. Vazquez — 3.93 yellow cards a game, 0.27 red cards, 22.67 fouls over 15 matches (2.2 to the home side, 1.73 to the away side).
Chicago Fire
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Lod n 8 | 52.1 | 3.2 | 1.1 | — |
| V. Radojevic n 8 | 45.9 | 2.5 | 2 | — |
| Leonardo Barroso n 8 | 58.1 | 1.9 | 0.2 | — |
| A. Gutman n 8 | 83.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | — |
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 76.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | Dániel Gazdag |
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Dithejane n 8 | 51.8 | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| Jonathan Bamba n 8 | 45.4 | 2 | 1.5 |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 61.8 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 76.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| R. Lewandowski n 8 | 75.3 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. Poreba n 3 | 22.7 | 0 | 1.3 |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 61.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| R. Lewandowski n 8 | 75.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| P. Dithejane n 8 | 51.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| A. Gutman n 8 | 83.3 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Leonardo Barroso n 8 | 58.1 | 3.3 |
| J. Gómez n 8 | 62.9 | 2.5 |
| M. Pineda n 8 | 30.6 | 2.2 |
| V. Radojevic n 8 | 45.9 | 2 |
| D. D'Avilla n 8 | 74.8 | 1.5 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| C. Brady n 8 | 91.4 | 3.3 |
New England Revolution
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Griffin Yow n 8 | 22.6 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Diego Fagúndez n 8 | 21.8 | 1.6 | 0 | — |
| M. Polster n 8 | 76 | 1.2 | 0 | — |
| Dániel Gazdag n 8 | 37.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | P. Zinckernagel |
| Luca Langoni n 8 | 41.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | — |
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| W. Harris n 8 | 12.3 | 3.7 | 0.9 |
| Griffin Yow n 8 | 22.6 | 3 | 2 |
| Peyton Miller n 8 | 80.5 | 2.8 | 1.7 |
| Dor Turgeman n 8 | 79 | 2.8 | 1.3 |
| Luca Langoni n 8 | 41.4 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| W. Harris n 8 | 12.3 | 0.9 | 0 |
| Carles Gil n 8 | 89.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| Peyton Miller n 8 | 80.5 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Dániel Gazdag n 8 | 37.8 | 0.6 | 0 |
| Luca Langoni n 8 | 41.4 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tanner Beason n 8 | 31 | 3.6 |
| Griffin Yow n 8 | 22.6 | 3.5 |
| Mamadou Fofana n 8 | 90 | 2.3 |
| Ilay Feingold n 8 | 55.5 | 2.2 |
| Cody Baker n 8 | 25.3 | 2.2 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner n 8 | 90 | 3.1 |
The next free picks, by email
The pick on this page was published before kick-off and graded afterwards. The daily email carries the next ones at 07:30 UK, each with its tier’s settled record, misses included. One click to leave.
Match statistics & details
| Chicago Fire | New England Revolution | |
|---|---|---|
| 61% | Possession | 39% |
| 1.92 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53 |
| 22 | Shots | 4 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 2 |
| 10 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 18 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 13 | Corners | 0 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14 | Fouls | 9 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Saves | 5 |
| 529 | Passes | 358 |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
Chicago Fire player stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Brady | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| J. Elliott | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.3 |
| N. Allen | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Y | 5.9 |
| S. Oregel | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | Y | 7.5 |
| D. D'Avilla | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.5 |
| P. Zinckernagel | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| R. Lewandowski | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| J. Dean | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 |
| J. Gómez | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| P. Dithejane | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.3 |
| S. Rogers | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.3 |
| A. Gutman sub | 45 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.5 |
| R. Lod sub | 35 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| M. Haile-Selassie sub | 35 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7.9 |
| Jonathan Bamba sub | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 |
New England Revolution player stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.9 |
| M. Polster | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Y | 7.2 |
| E. Kohler | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Mamadou Fofana | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.6 |
| William Sands | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Brooklyn Raines | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Carles Gil | 88 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Peyton Miller | 88 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | Y | 6.7 |
| Dor Turgeman | 81 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8.5 |
| Jackson Yueill | 69 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Dániel Gazdag | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Griffin Yow sub | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 |
| J. Wynder sub | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Ilay Feingold sub | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.9 |
| Cody Baker sub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 |
| W. Harris sub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.3 |
Sh = shots, SoT = shots on target, KP = key passes, Tkl = tackles; – = not recorded for that player. Rating is the data provider’s.
Form, head-to-head & standings
The numbers behind Chicago Fire v New England Revolution — recent results, past meetings and where each side sits. (TACTIX’s model forecast is in the projections below.)
- 2025-10-18 New England Revolution 2–2 Chicago Fire
- 2025-09-07 Chicago Fire 3–2 New England Revolution
- 2025-05-20 New England Revolution 1–3 Chicago Fire
- 2024-05-05 Chicago Fire 0–1 New England Revolution
- 2024-03-23 New England Revolution 1–1 Chicago Fire
- 2023-09-24 Chicago Fire 2–2 New England Revolution
The full post-match picture
Pro members see this match shot by shot — every attempt with its expected-goals value, the situation and shot-type breakdowns, the xG timeline, and how the model’s pre-match probabilities compared with what happened. Plus every market the model graded for this fixture.
Try Pro for £1.00 — the full match analysis£1.00 for 14 days, then £9.99/month. Cancel in the trial and pay nothing more.
Frequently asked questions
- What was the model’s pick for Chicago Fire v New England Revolution?
- TACTIX’s free model pick for Chicago Fire v New England Revolution was Over 2.5 goals (best price 1.50 at Betano).
- What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire and New England Revolution?
- In their last 6 meetings, Chicago Fire won 2, New England Revolution won 1 and there were 3 draws, averaging 3.33 goals per game.
- What is the recent form of Chicago Fire and New England Revolution?
- Recent form — Chicago Fire 0W 4D 1L; New England Revolution 3W 1D 1L.
Today’s boards
Every fixture kicking off in the UK day, and the fixtures where the free pick leads with each market.
This page is generated from TACTIX’s match data by our software and checked automatically; data as of . How it works → · Report an error
How our model works · Live track record · Predictions are model output, not betting advice.