FC Augsburg v 1. FC Heidenheim result
Team pages: FC Augsburg · 1. FC Heidenheim · Head-to-head
FC Augsburg 1–0 1. FC Heidenheim — FC Augsburg won this Bundesliga match.
What xG said
xG said FC Augsburg: 1.97 to 0.70 in expected goals, from 12 shots to 16, ahead on xG from the 79th minute (per-shot expected goals for this match).
The result
FC Augsburg beat 1. FC Heidenheim 1–0 at WWK Arena in the Bundesliga on Sunday 15 February. 1. FC Heidenheim are winless in their last nine matches in all competitions.
The goals
It was 0–0 at half-time. The goals — FC Augsburg: Alexis Claude-Maurice (80’ pen).
Discipline
Felix Zwayer, Germany showed three yellow cards — against 3.5 yellows a game across the last 16 matches refereed (this competition). The bookings — FC Augsburg: Finn Dahmen (90+4’); 1. FC Heidenheim: B. Gimber (79’) and B. Zivzivadze (90+3’).
What it changes
FC Augsburg move up from 12th to 11th (22 league matches played).
1. FC Heidenheim stay 18th after this result (22 league matches played).
Who stood out
By TACTIX Impact for this match, Alexis Claude-Maurice (FC Augsburg) 7.4, Arijon Ibrahimović (1. FC Heidenheim) 5.9 and Keven Schlotterbeck (FC Augsburg) 5.7 led the match.
Next up
FC Augsburg next host Union Berlin on 24 October 2026.
1. FC Heidenheim next host Energie Cottbus on 24 October 2026.
Written from the matches TACTIX holds for both sides; each figure names the games it is counted over.
Next for FC Augsburg: FC Augsburg v Union Berlin, Saturday 24 October — the preview. Next for 1. FC Heidenheim: 1. FC Heidenheim v Energie Cottbus, Saturday 24 October — the preview.
The numbers
- Result: FC Augsburg 1–0 1. FC Heidenheim · Bundesliga
- Venue: WWK Arena · Augsburg
- Referee: Felix Zwayer, Germany
- Head-to-head (last 5): FC Augsburg 3 · draws 0 · 1. FC Heidenheim 2 · 3.6 goals/game
- Recent form: FC Augsburg 2W 2D 1L · 1. FC Heidenheim 0W 1D 4L
FC Augsburg 1–0 1. FC Heidenheim (Bundesliga): this fixture is settled. TACTIX’s pre-match coverage ran across every major market, and every graded call — wins and losses — is in the live track record (as of 30 July 2026). See the live track record →
Key stats
Per game, last 8 completed matches, to 7 February 2026. Over/under figures use standard thresholds, not bookmaker lines.
| Per game | FC Augsburg for / against | Line | 1. FC Heidenheim for / against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 0.88 for · 1.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 2.5standard | 0.88 for · 2.38 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Corners won | 4.75 for · 5.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 9.5standard | 5 for · 5.88 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots | 13.38 for · 12.75 against n 8 Last 5 | 19.5standard | 13.5 for · 15.25 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots on target | 4.63 for · 4.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 8.5standard | 3.75 for · 6.63 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Fouls committed | 9.88 for · 14.63 against n 8 Last 5 | 21.5standard | 10.13 for · 8.88 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Cards shown | 2.13 for · 1.63 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.5standard | 1.63 for · 1.75 against n 8 Last 5 |
Referee: Felix Zwayer, Germany — 3.5 yellow cards a game, 0.13 red cards, 21.13 fouls over 16 matches (1.75 to the home side, 1.75 to the away side).
FC Augsburg
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Essende n 8 | 27.4 | 2.5 | 2.9 | — |
| M. Pedersen n 8 | 24.8 | 2.3 | 1.4 | — |
| Ismaël Gharbi n 8 | 34.1 | 2 | 3.6 | — |
| Rodrigo Ribeiro n 8 | 17.1 | 2 | 2 | — |
| P. Tietz n 8 | 74.9 | 1.8 | 1.1 | — |
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Essende n 8 | 27.4 | 3.3 | 0.4 |
| Ismaël Gharbi n 8 | 34.1 | 3 | 0.3 |
| A. Claude-Maurice n 8 | 85.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| P. Tietz n 8 | 74.9 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| M. Kömür n 8 | 42.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| D. Giannoulis n 8 | 73.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Michael Gregoritsch n 8 | 47.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| A. Claude-Maurice n 8 | 85.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| P. Tietz n 8 | 74.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| M. Kömür n 8 | 42.1 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Noahkai Kai Daniel Banks n 8 | 84.4 | 3.2 |
| M. Pedersen n 8 | 24.8 | 3.2 |
| Arthur Chaves n 8 | 57.9 | 2.9 |
| R. Fellhauer n 8 | 88 | 2.6 |
| K. Jakić n 8 | 58.8 | 1.9 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| F. Dahmen n 8 | 90 | 2.5 |
1. FC Heidenheim
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Kerber n 8 | 28.3 | 2.8 | 1.2 | — |
| M. Pieringer n 8 | 72.5 | 2.2 | 1.4 | — |
| M. Kaufmann n 8 | 32.9 | 2.1 | 1.4 | — |
| S. Schimmer n 8 | 28.6 | 2 | 0.4 | — |
| B. Gimber n 8 | 74.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 | — |
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Schimmer n 8 | 28.6 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| E. Dinkçi n 8 | 44.1 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
| M. Pieringer n 8 | 72.5 | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| S. Conteh n 8 | 49 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| A. Ibrahimović n 8 | 68.3 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Schimmer n 8 | 28.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| J. Niehues n 8 | 60 | 0.6 | 0 |
| T. Keller n 8 | 78.8 | 0.4 | 0 |
| L. Stergiou n 8 | 53.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| S. Conteh n 8 | 49 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| N. Dorsch n 8 | 79.8 | 3.7 |
| Hennes Behrens n 5 | 44.4 | 3.2 |
| L. Kerber n 8 | 28.3 | 3.2 |
| B. Gimber n 8 | 74.5 | 2.4 |
| Y. Wagner n 4 | 11.3 | 2 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| D. Ramaj n 8 | 90 | 3.8 |
The day’s free picks, by email
Every morning at 07:30 UK: the model’s free picks, each with its confidence tier and that tier’s settled record, misses included. No tips, no guarantees, one click to leave.
Match statistics & details
| FC Augsburg | 1. FC Heidenheim | |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Possession | 51% |
| 1.94 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 12 | Shots | 16 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Corners | 5 |
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 2 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Saves | 3 |
| 459 | Passes | 470 |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
FC Augsburg player stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Dahmen | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Y | 7.5 |
| Noahkai Kai Daniel Banks | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7.6 |
| K. Schlotterbeck | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.9 |
| C. Zesiger | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 |
| H. Massengo | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7.3 |
| A. Claude-Maurice | 90 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 |
| M. Kömür | 89 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6.3 |
| K. Jakić | 73 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| R. Fellhauer | 73 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 |
| A. Kade | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Michael Gregoritsch | 59 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 |
| M. Wolf sub | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 |
| Rodrigo Ribeiro sub | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| D. Giannoulis sub | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 |
| E. Rexhbeçaj sub | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.3 |
| F. Rieder sub | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
1. FC Heidenheim player stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Ramaj | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 |
| M. Busch | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 |
| P. Mainka | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| B. Gimber | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Y | 6.9 |
| A. Ibrahimović | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7.2 |
| E. Dinkçi | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| J. Schöppner | 87 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Hennes Behrens | 87 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 |
| J. Niehues | 81 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| C. Conteh | 64 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 |
| S. Schimmer | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 |
| S. Conteh sub | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 |
| M. Pieringer sub | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 |
| B. Zivzivadze sub | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Y | 6.2 |
| A. Beck sub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 |
| M. Honsak sub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
Sh = shots, SoT = shots on target, KP = key passes, Tkl = tackles; – = not recorded for that player. Rating is the data provider’s.
Form, head-to-head & standings
The numbers behind FC Augsburg v 1. FC Heidenheim — recent results, past meetings and where each side sits. (TACTIX’s model forecast is in the projections below.)
- 2025-09-27 1. FC Heidenheim 2–1 FC Augsburg
- 2025-01-25 FC Augsburg 2–1 1. FC Heidenheim
- 2024-09-01 1. FC Heidenheim 4–0 FC Augsburg
- 2024-03-09 FC Augsburg 1–0 FC Heidenheim
- 2023-10-22 FC Heidenheim 2–5 FC Augsburg
Shot map and expected goals
FC Augsburg 1.97 xG from 12 shots, 1. FC Heidenheim 0.70 from 16. Every mark is one shot, placed where it was taken and sized by the chance it had of becoming a goal. Filled marks with a white ring are goals.
| Team | Shots | Goals | xG |
|---|---|---|---|
| FC Augsburg | 12 | 1 | 1.97 |
| 1. FC Heidenheim | 16 | 0 | 0.70 |
Shot locations and expected-goals values from per-shot data. Per-shot tables, situation and shot-type breakdowns are part of TACTIX Pro.
The full post-match picture
Pro members see this match shot by shot — every attempt with its expected-goals value, the situation and shot-type breakdowns, the xG timeline, and how the model’s pre-match probabilities compared with what happened. Plus every market the model graded for this fixture.
Try Pro for £1.00 — the full match analysis£1.00 for 14 days, then £9.99/month. Cancel in the trial and pay nothing more.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the head-to-head record between FC Augsburg and 1. FC Heidenheim?
- In their last 5 meetings, FC Augsburg won 3, 1. FC Heidenheim won 2 and there were 0 draws, averaging 3.6 goals per game.
- What is the recent form of FC Augsburg and 1. FC Heidenheim?
- Recent form — FC Augsburg 2W 2D 1L; 1. FC Heidenheim 0W 1D 4L.
Today’s boards
Every fixture kicking off in the UK day, and the fixtures where the free pick leads with each market.
This page is generated from TACTIX’s match data by our software and checked automatically; data as of . How it works → · Report an error
How our model works · Live track record · Predictions are model output, not betting advice.