New England Revolution v Chicago Fire result
Team pages: New England Revolution · Chicago Fire · Head-to-head
The model’s pre-match pick
New England Revolution 1–0 Chicago Fire — New England Revolution won this Major League Soccer match. TACTIX’s pre-match model pick was Over 2.5 goals.
The result
New England Revolution beat Chicago Fire 1–0 at Gillette Stadium in Major League Soccer on Sunday 18 October. Expected goals (xG) tell a different story: Chicago Fire out-shot New England Revolution 19 to 5 and created the better chances, 1.09 xG to 0.27 (the provider’s expected goals for this match). Variance.
The goals
New England Revolution led 1–0 at half-time. The goals — New England Revolution: M. Polster (26’, assisted by Carles Gil).
How it turned
Replaying TACTIX’s published pre-match model through the match’s one key moment (goals and red cards), the biggest swing came with M. Polster’s goal on 26 minutes.
Discipline
Nabil Bensalah, USA showed two yellow cards — against 2.3 yellows a game across the last 6 matches refereed (all competitions). The bookings — New England Revolution: E. Kohler (79’); Chicago Fire: A. Gutman (58’).
What it changes
New England Revolution have scored 55 goals, the 14th-most (shared) of the 30 clubs (2026 so far, after 33 games). New England Revolution have conceded 46 goals, the seventh-fewest of the 30 clubs.
Chicago Fire have scored 61 goals, the eighth-most of the 30 clubs (2026 so far, after 33 games). Chicago Fire have conceded 50 goals, the 13th-fewest (shared) of the 30 clubs.
Who stood out
By TACTIX Impact for this match, Carles Gil (New England Revolution) 6.0, Matt Turner (New England Revolution) 5.8 and M. Polster (New England Revolution) 5.2 led the match.
What the model said
The model’s free pick, Over 2.5 goals, did not land — graded in the live track record, misses included.
Next up
New England Revolution next travel to Orlando City SC on 7 November 2026.
Chicago Fire next host Columbus Crew on 7 November 2026.
Written from the matches TACTIX holds for both sides; each figure names the games it is counted over.
Next for New England Revolution: Orlando City SC v New England Revolution, Saturday 7 November — the preview. Next for Chicago Fire: Chicago Fire v Columbus Crew, Saturday 7 November — the preview.
The Numbers
- Result: New England Revolution 1–0 Chicago Fire · Major League Soccer
- Venue: Gillette Stadium · Foxborough, Massachusetts
- Referee: Nabil Bensalah, USA
- Model coverage: 246 markets priced for this fixture
- Head-to-head (last 6): New England Revolution 2 · draws 2 · Chicago Fire 2 · 3.17 goals/game
- Recent form: New England Revolution 3W 0D 2L · Chicago Fire 3W 0D 2L
New England Revolution 1–0 Chicago Fire (Major League Soccer): this fixture is settled. TACTIX’s pre-match coverage ran across 246 markets, and every graded call — wins and losses — is in the live track record (as of 2 November 2026). See the live track record →
Key Stats
Per game, last 8 completed matches, to 15 October 2026. Over/under figures use standard thresholds, not bookmaker lines.
| Per game | New England Revolution for / against | Line | Chicago Fire for / against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.88 for · 1.88 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.25our book | 1.63 for · 1.88 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Corners won | 5.75 for · 7 against n 8 Last 5 | 9.5standard | 4.25 for · 4.88 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots | 14.5 for · 13.13 against n 8 Last 5 | 19.5standard | 14.88 for · 14 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots on target | 6.13 for · 5.25 against n 8 Last 5 | 8.5standard | 5 for · 5.13 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Fouls committed | 8.88 for · 9.75 against n 8 Last 5 | 21.5standard | 12.38 for · 11.88 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Cards shown | 2 for · 1.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.5standard | 2.63 for · 2.25 against n 8 Last 5 |
Referee: Nabil Bensalah, USA.
New England Revolution
New England Revolution Goalkeeper
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Saves | Goals conceded | Penalties saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner | 29 | 902622 min | 1113.8 /90 | 291 /90 | 00 /90 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner n 8 | 90 | 3.4 |
New England Revolution Defensive
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels won | Fouls committed | Yellow cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Sands | 29 | 882540 min | 431.5 /90 | 281 /90 | 70.2 /90 | 1495.3 /90 | 291 /90 | 50.2 /90 |
| Mamadou Fofana | 26 | 902352 min | 522 /90 | 391.5 /90 | 140.5 /90 | 813.1 /90 | 170.7 /90 | 40.2 /90 |
| M. Polster | 23 | 751714 min | 150.8 /90 | 160.8 /90 | 50.3 /90 | 522.7 /90 | 221.2 /90 | 50.3 /90 |
| Ethan Kohler | 16 | 851356 min | 130.9 /90 | 161.1 /90 | 161.1 /90 | 473.1 /90 | 90.6 /90 | 10.1 /90 |
| Ilay Feingold | 12 | 66795 min | 182 /90 | 101.1 /90 | 20.2 /90 | 465.2 /90 | 50.6 /90 | 20.2 /90 |
| See more players · Pro Try Pro for £1, then £9.99 a month unless you cancel · 18+ | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0.3 | — |
| Carles Gil n 8 | 88.5 | 0.1 | 2.4 | M. Haile-Selassie |
| William Sands n 8 | 88 | 1.4 | 1 | — |
| Dor Turgeman n 8 | 84.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | P. Zinckernagel |
| Mamadou Fofana n 8 | 90 | 1 | 0 | — |
| See more players · Pro | ||||
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Carles Gil n 8 | 88.5 | 0.4 |
| William Sands n 8 | 88 | 1.3 |
| Dor Turgeman n 8 | 84.4 | 0.1 |
| Mamadou Fofana n 8 | 90 | 2.3 |
| Brooklyn Raines n 8 | 90 | 2 |
| See more players · Pro | ||
New England Revolution Attacking
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Goals | Assists | Shots | Shots on target | Key passes | Dribbles completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dor Turgeman | 28 | 832318 min | 90.3 /90 | 70.3 /90 | 522 /90 | 251 /90 | 230.9 /90 | 150.6 /90 |
| Peyton Miller | 25 | 751868 min | 60.3 /90 | 60.3 /90 | 532.6 /90 | 301.4 /90 | 201 /90 | 60.3 /90 |
| Luca Langoni | 18 | 581040 min | 30.3 /90 | 60.5 /90 | 201.7 /90 | 121 /90 | 161.4 /90 | 80.7 /90 |
| Griffin Yow | 17 | 50852 min | 10.1 /90 | 00 /90 | 151.6 /90 | 91 /90 | 111.2 /90 | 50.5 /90 |
| Marcos Zambrano | 5 | 45223 min | 00 /90 | 10.4 /90 | 20.8 /90 | 00 /90 | 10.4 /90 | 00 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| Carles Gil n 8 | 88.5 | 2 | 1.1 |
| William Sands n 8 | 88 | 0.1 | 0 |
| Dor Turgeman n 8 | 84.4 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| Mamadou Fofana n 8 | 90 | 0.3 | 0 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Turner n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| Carles Gil n 8 | 88.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| William Sands n 8 | 88 | 0 | 0 |
| Dor Turgeman n 8 | 84.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| Mamadou Fofana n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0.1 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire Goalkeeper
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Saves | Goals conceded | Penalties saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Brady | 31 | 912828 min | 933 /90 | 441.4 /90 | 00 /90 |
| J. Cohen | 2 | 90180 min | 31.5 /90 | 10.5 /90 | 00 /90 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| C. Brady n 8 | 91.5 | 3.1 |
Chicago Fire Defensive
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels won | Fouls committed | Yellow cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Elliott | 30 | 882641 min | 301 /90 | 220.7 /90 | 260.9 /90 | 973.3 /90 | 260.9 /90 | 80.3 /90 |
| J. Dean | 26 | 771999 min | 421.9 /90 | 291.3 /90 | 90.4 /90 | 954.3 /90 | 160.7 /90 | 30.1 /90 |
| A. Gutman | 25 | 761909 min | 331.6 /90 | 180.8 /90 | 110.5 /90 | 833.9 /90 | 291.4 /90 | 40.2 /90 |
| J. Waterman | 18 | 771384 min | 140.9 /90 | 151 /90 | 140.9 /90 | 473.1 /90 | 181.2 /90 | 60.4 /90 |
| M. Pineda | 18 | 50907 min | 242.4 /90 | 101 /90 | 20.2 /90 | 404 /90 | 121.2 /90 | 10.1 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 78 | 2.3 | 2 | Dor Turgeman |
| C. Brady n 8 | 91.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | — |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 75.8 | 1 | 1.3 | Carles Gil |
| J. Elliott n 8 | 85.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | — |
| A. Saletros n 8 | 72.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | — |
| See more players · Pro | ||||
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 78 | 1.7 |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 75.8 | 1.2 |
| J. Elliott n 8 | 85.3 | 1.2 |
| A. Saletros n 8 | 72.5 | 1.1 |
| D. D'Avilla n 8 | 81.3 | 0.8 |
| See more players · Pro | ||
Chicago Fire Attacking
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Goals | Assists | Shots | Shots on target | Key passes | Dribbles completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Dithejane | 22 | 40889 min | 40.4 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 212.1 /90 | 131.3 /90 | 171.7 /90 | 212.1 /90 |
| R. Lewandowski | 17 | 761293 min | 70.5 /90 | 20.1 /90 | 271.9 /90 | 130.9 /90 | 130.9 /90 | 151 /90 |
| H. Cuypers | 11 | 90989 min | 131.2 /90 | 00 /90 | 343.1 /90 | 222 /90 | 111 /90 | 90.8 /90 |
| J. Gómez | 6 | 56338 min | 00 /90 | 00 /90 | 41.1 /90 | 20.5 /90 | 41.1 /90 | 10.3 /90 |
| Dylan Borso | 2 | 4080 min | 00 /90 | 00 /90 | 33.4 /90 | 11.1 /90 | 00 /90 | 11.1 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 78 | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| C. Brady n 8 | 91.5 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 75.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
| J. Elliott n 8 | 85.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| A. Saletros n 8 | 72.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Zinckernagel n 8 | 78 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| C. Brady n 8 | 91.5 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Haile-Selassie n 8 | 75.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| J. Elliott n 8 | 85.3 | 0 | 0 |
| A. Saletros n 8 | 72.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
The next free picks, by email
The pick on this page was published before kick-off and graded afterwards. The daily email carries the next ones at 07:30 UK, each with its tier’s settled record, misses included. One click to leave.
Match Statistics & Details
| New England Revolution | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Possession | 62% |
| 0.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 5 | Shots | 19 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6 |
| 1 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 0 | Blocked shots | 10 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 0 | Corners | 10 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 6 | Saves | 3 |
| 363 | Passes | 573 |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90% |
New England Revolution Player Stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Wynder | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7.9 |
| Carles Gil | 90 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7.2 |
| E. Kohler | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Y | 7.2 |
| Peyton Miller | 90 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.6 |
| M. Polster | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.9 |
| Brooklyn Raines | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| Matt Turner | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 |
| Ilay Feingold | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 |
| Dor Turgeman | 86 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 |
| William Sands | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 |
| Luca Langoni | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Dániel Gazdag sub | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Jackson Yueill sub | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| Tanner Beason sub | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Cody Baker sub | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.9 |
Chicago Fire Player Stats
| Player | Min | G | A | Sh | SoT | KP | Tkl | Cards | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Zinckernagel | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| M. Haile-Selassie | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| A. Hanche-Olsen | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| R. Lewandowski | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6.2 |
| M. Mbokazi | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.2 |
| A. Saletros | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| C. Brady | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| Leonardo Barroso | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.2 |
| D. D'Avilla | 68 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7.3 |
| Jonathan Bamba | 67 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 |
| A. Gutman | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Y | 6.3 |
| N. Allen sub | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6.9 |
| P. Dithejane sub | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
| A. Mekvabishvili sub | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| J. Gómez sub | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 |
Sh = shots, SoT = shots on target, KP = key passes, Tkl = tackles; – = not recorded for that player. Rating is the data provider’s.
Form, Head-to-Head & Standings
The numbers behind New England Revolution v Chicago Fire — recent results, past meetings and where each side sits. (TACTIX’s model forecast is in the projections below.)
- 2026-09-13 Chicago Fire 1–2 New England Revolution
- 2025-10-18 New England Revolution 2–2 Chicago Fire
- 2025-09-07 Chicago Fire 3–2 New England Revolution
- 2025-05-20 New England Revolution 1–3 Chicago Fire
- 2024-05-05 Chicago Fire 0–1 New England Revolution
- 2024-03-23 New England Revolution 1–1 Chicago Fire
The Full Post-Match Picture
Pro members see this match shot by shot — every attempt with its expected-goals value, the situation and shot-type breakdowns, the xG timeline, and how the model’s pre-match probabilities compared with what happened. Plus every market the model graded for this fixture.
then £9.99 a month unless you cancel · 18+
Frequently Asked Questions
- What was the model’s pick for New England Revolution v Chicago Fire?
- TACTIX’s free model pick for New England Revolution v Chicago Fire was Over 2.5 goals (best price 1.50 at Bet365).
- What is the head-to-head record between New England Revolution and Chicago Fire?
- In their last 6 meetings, New England Revolution won 2, Chicago Fire won 2 and there were 2 draws, averaging 3.17 goals per game.
- What is the recent form of New England Revolution and Chicago Fire?
- Recent form — New England Revolution 3W 0D 2L; Chicago Fire 3W 0D 2L.
Today’s Boards
Every fixture kicking off in the UK day, and the fixtures where the free pick leads with each market.
This page is generated from TACTIX’s match data by our software and checked automatically; data as of . How it works → · Report an error
How our model works · Live track record · Predictions are model output, not betting advice.