Serie A: Players Ranked by TACTIX Impact
Lautaro Martínez finished 2021/22 top of Serie A by TACTIX Impact at 6.9 per match over 10 appearances — an open rating with every weight published (as of 22 May 2022).
TACTIX Impact is our open, transparent player rating, built from raw match actions with every weight published. Tap any player for their full TACTIX hub, or a club for its team hub.
Qualifying: 10+ appearances · 38 matches played by the busiest team · league matches onlyFinal
| # | Player | Team | Apps | G | A | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lautaro Martínez | Inter | 10 | 12 | 0 | 6.9 |
| 2 | D. Criscito | Genoa | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5.9 |
| 3 | D. Berardi | Sassuolo | 27 | 10 | 13 | 5.8 |
| 4 | N. Barella | Inter | 11 | 1 | 6 | 5.4 |
| 5 | E. Džeko | Inter | 10 | 5 | 3 | 5.4 |
| 6 | H. Çalhanoğlu | Inter | 11 | 3 | 5 | 5.3 |
| 7 | Deulofeu | Udinese | 12 | 7 | 2 | 5.2 |
| 8 | Dušan Vlahović | Juventus +1 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
| 9 | A. Candreva | Sampdoria | 17 | 4 | 7 | 4.5 |
| 10 | M. Badelj | Genoa | 21 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 |
| 11 | M. Brozović | Inter | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 |
| 12 | P. Stojanović | Empoli | 22 | 1 | 0 | 4.1 |
| 13 | S. Zurkowski | Empoli | 24 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 14 | Rodrigo Becão | Udinese | 12 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 15 | D. Udogie | Udinese | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3.9 |
| 16 | Silvan Hefti | Genoa | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 |
| 17 | Walace | Udinese | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3.7 |
| 18 | Federico Fazio | Salernitana | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3.7 |
| 19 | Francesco Caputo | Sampdoria +1 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 3.6 |
| 20 | J. Vásquez | Genoa | 16 | 1 | 0 | 3.6 |
| 21 | E. Ampadu | Venezia | 15 | 0 | 1 | 3.6 |
| 22 | Nahuel Molina | Udinese | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3.6 |
| 23 | F. Đuričić | Sassuolo | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3.6 |
| 24 | M. Lopez | Sassuolo | 30 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 25 | N. Bajrami | Empoli | 24 | 5 | 5 | 3.5 |
| 26 | A. Grassi | Cagliari | 20 | 0 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 27 | I. Perišić | Inter | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 28 | D. Frattesi | Sassuolo | 31 | 2 | 3 | 3.4 |
| 29 | H. Traorè | Sassuolo | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3.4 |
| 30 | A. Pinamonti | Empoli | 24 | 9 | 1 | 3.4 |
| 31 | N. Nández | Cagliari | 11 | 0 | 1 | 3.4 |
| 32 | S. Verdi | Salernitana +1 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 3.4 |
| 33 | B. Bereszyński | Sampdoria | 17 | 0 | 1 | 3.3 |
| 34 | T. Henry | Venezia | 18 | 7 | 2 | 3.2 |
| 35 | Mattia Caldara | Venezia | 17 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 |
| 36 | J. Galvão | Cagliari | 22 | 7 | 1 | 3.1 |
| 37 | R. Bellanova | Cagliari | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3.1 |
| 38 | N. Rovella | Genoa | 12 | 0 | 2 | 3.1 |
| 39 | G. Raspadori | Sassuolo | 30 | 9 | 3 | 3 |
| 40 | Gianluca Scamacca | Sassuolo | 30 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| 41 | L. Coulibaly | Salernitana | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 42 | A. Tamèze | Hellas Verona | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 43 | M. Bani | Genoa | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 44 | N. Perez | Udinese | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 45 | P. Ceccaroni | Venezia | 20 | 2 | 1 | 2.9 |
| 46 | J. Boga | Sassuolo +1 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2.9 |
| 47 | M. Viti | Empoli | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 48 | L. Tonelli | Empoli | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 49 | D. Dumfries | Inter | 11 | 1 | 2 | 2.9 |
| 50 | B. Nuytinck | Udinese | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 |
Impact per Match — Top 10
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who had the highest TACTIX Impact in Serie A in 2021/22?
- Lautaro Martínez finished 2021/22 top of Serie A on TACTIX Impact, averaging 6.9 per match across 10 appearances (players need 10+ appearances to qualify).
- What is TACTIX Impact?
- TACTIX Impact is an open player rating built from raw match actions — goals, assists, key passes, successful dribbles, duels, defensive actions and more — with every weight published. Higher is better.
- Is this the final Serie A Impact ranking for 2021/22?
- Yes — 2021/22 is complete, so this board is the final ranking for that season. Earlier and later seasons are linked above.
Impact Leaderboards by Country
England
Scotland
Netherlands
Portugal
Japan
Mexico
South Korea
Australia
Saudi Arabia
Ireland
Greece
Ukraine
Switzerland
Austria
Poland
Croatia
Sweden
Norway
Argentina
Brazil
China
Denmark
Colombia
Peru
World
CONMEBOL
International
CONCACAF
Serie A: tables, fixtures and predictions.
How TACTIX Impact is calculated · Live track record · Stats are historical; predictions are model output, not betting advice.