London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W prediction
Team pages: London City Lionesses W · Birmingham City W
TACTIX model preview
TACTIX’s model makes Home win the free pick for London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W, FA WSL on Sun, 08 Nov 2026 14:30 GMT.
The match
London City Lionesses W host Birmingham City W in the FA WSL on Sunday 8 November (kick-off 14:30 UK); the model’s free pick is London City Lionesses W to win.
The key numbers
Both teams scored in 13 of London City Lionesses W’s last 15 results in all competitions (87%).
London City Lionesses W have scored in 13 consecutive matches in all competitions. Birmingham City W have scored in five consecutive matches in all competitions.
Form and the table
11 of London City Lionesses W’s last 15 results in all competitions went over 2.5 goals (73%). At home, London City Lionesses W have five wins, one draw and two defeats in their last 8 home matches in all competitions — 2.00 points per game, scoring 1.88 and conceding 1.13. London City Lionesses W have scored 20 goals, the fourth-most of the 14 clubs (2026/27 so far, after 8 games, ranked per game). London City Lionesses W have conceded 10 goals, the fifth-fewest of the 14 clubs.
Eight of Birmingham City W’s last 15 results in all competitions went over 2.5 goals (53%). Both teams scored in eight of Birmingham City W’s last 15 results in all competitions (53%). Away from home, Birmingham City W have two wins, one draw and five defeats in their last 8 away matches in all competitions — 0.88 points per game, scoring 1.13 and conceding 2.38. Birmingham City W have scored 10 goals, the seventh-most (shared) of the 14 clubs (2026/27 so far, after 8 games, ranked per game). Birmingham City W have conceded 17 goals, the fourth-most (shared) of the 14 clubs.
London City Lionesses W (third) and Birmingham City W (12th) are 10 points apart, 2026/27 so far. TACTIX’s Glicko-2 team ratings have London City Lionesses W the stronger side, 435 rating points above Birmingham City W (London City Lionesses W 1792, Birmingham City W 1356, after at least 30 rated matches each).
Team news
Predicted London City Lionesses W XI (4-2-3-1): E. Lete, J. Fernández, L. Corrales, M. León, M. Pérez, G. Geyoro, D. Arques, D. van de Donk, A. Putellas, K. Diani, F. Godfrey — derived from the last 8 line-ups, most-used eleven. By TACTIX Impact, D. van de Donk (6.1 per match over eight appearances, three goals and four assists) and Kadidiatou Diani (6.1 per match over seven appearances, three goals and three assists) have been London City Lionesses W’s most influential players 2026/27, all competitions. In numbers for London City Lionesses W (2026/27, all competitions, before kick-off), D. van de Donk averages 1.9 key passes per 90 over 708 minutes, with a key pass in seven of the last eight appearances. Kadidiatou Diani averages 2.1 key passes per 90 over 481 minutes, with a key pass in seven of the last seven appearances.
Predicted Birmingham City W XI (4-2-3-1): S. Baggaley, M. Turner, N. Herron, R. McKenna, S. Cooke, L. Naalsund, L. Crosthwaite, S. Amano, A. Miyagawa, M. Levasseur, L. Geum-Min — derived from the last 8 line-ups, most-used eleven. By TACTIX Impact, N. Herron (4.9 per match over eight appearances, one goal and two assists) and S. Baggaley (3.8 per match over eight appearances) have been Birmingham City W’s most influential players 2026/27, all competitions. In numbers for Birmingham City W (2026/27, all competitions, before kick-off), N. Herron averages 1.9 tackles per 90 over 707 minutes, with a tackle in four of the last eight appearances. S. Baggaley averages 5.3 saves per 90 over 720 minutes, with two or more saves in eight of the last eight appearances.
Written from the matches TACTIX holds for both sides; each figure names the games it is counted over.
The Numbers
- Kick-off: · FA WSL · Princes Park
- Referee: Phoebe Cross
- Model coverage: 246 markets priced for this fixture
- Recent form: London City Lionesses W 3W 1D 1L · Birmingham City W 1W 2D 2L
London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W (FA WSL): the key numbers are on this page — and TACTIX’s live, market-by-market track record is one click away (as of 8 November 2026). See the live track record →
Key Stats
Per game, last 8 completed matches, to 1 November 2026. Over/under figures use standard thresholds, not bookmaker lines.
| Per game | London City Lionesses W for / against | Line | Birmingham City W for / against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 2.5 for · 1.25 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.5our book | 1.25 for · 2.13 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Corners won | 6 for · 4 against n 8 Last 5 | 9.5standard | 4 for · 8.75 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots | 16.88 for · 9.25 against n 8 Last 5 | 19.5standard | 12 for · 20.5 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Shots on target | 6.13 for · 2.63 against n 8 Last 5 | 8.5standard | 3.88 for · 7.38 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Fouls committed | 10.75 for · 8.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 21.5standard | 9.75 for · 10.63 against n 8 Last 5 |
| Cards shown | 1 for · 1.5 against n 8 Last 5 | 3.5standard | 0.88 for · 1.38 against n 8 Last 5 |
Referee: Phoebe Cross.
London City Lionesses W
London City Lionesses W Goalkeeper
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Saves | Goals conceded | Penalties saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elene Lete | 7 | 90630 min | 111.6 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 00 /90 |
| Mary Earps | 1 | 9090 min | 11 /90 | 00 /90 | 00 /90 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Elene Lete n 8 | 90 | 1.5 |
London City Lionesses W Defensive
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels won | Fouls committed | Yellow cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mapi León | 7 | 85595 min | 91.4 /90 | 142.1 /90 | 00 /90 | 192.9 /90 | 81.2 /90 | 10.2 /90 |
| Jana Fernández | 7 | 76535 min | 233.9 /90 | 101.7 /90 | 30.5 /90 | 396.6 /90 | 81.3 /90 | 10.2 /90 |
| LucÃa Corrales | 6 | 70417 min | 81.7 /90 | 91.9 /90 | 10.2 /90 | 143 /90 | 20.4 /90 | 00 /90 |
| I. Kardinaal | 5 | 90450 min | 81.6 /90 | 91.8 /90 | 00 /90 | 142.8 /90 | 20.4 /90 | 00 /90 |
| P. Pattinson | 4 | 50200 min | 62.7 /90 | 00 /90 | 20.9 /90 | 94.1 /90 | 52.3 /90 | 00 /90 |
| See more players · Pro Try Pro for £1, then £9.99 a month unless you cancel · 18+ | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Geyoro n 8 | 88.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | — |
| D. van de Donk n 8 | 88.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | — |
| Alexia Putellas n 8 | 79 | 0.7 | 1 | — |
| Elene Lete n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Mapi León n 7 | 85 | 1.2 | 0.8 | — |
| See more players · Pro | ||||
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| G. Geyoro n 8 | 88.9 | 3.5 |
| D. van de Donk n 8 | 88.5 | 1.7 |
| Alexia Putellas n 8 | 79 | 1.3 |
| Mapi León n 7 | 85 | 1.4 |
| Daniela Arques n 7 | 79.4 | 4.2 |
| See more players · Pro | ||
London City Lionesses W Attacking
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Goals | Assists | Shots | Shots on target | Key passes | Dribbles completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Godfrey | 7 | 52366 min | 20.5 /90 | 00 /90 | 92.2 /90 | 41 /90 | 61.5 /90 | 20.5 /90 |
| D. Cascarino | 5 | 49246 min | 10.4 /90 | 20.7 /90 | 62.2 /90 | 31.1 /90 | 82.9 /90 | 93.3 /90 |
| N. Anyomi | 5 | 23117 min | 10.8 /90 | 00 /90 | 86.2 /90 | 43.1 /90 | 00 /90 | 00 /90 |
| I. Goodwin | 2 | 63125 min | 21.4 /90 | 00 /90 | 96.5 /90 | 42.9 /90 | 00 /90 | 21.4 /90 |
| G. Geyoro | 8 | 89711 min | 00 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 91.1 /90 | 20.3 /90 | 70.9 /90 | 131.6 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Geyoro n 8 | 88.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| D. van de Donk n 8 | 88.5 | 3.2 | 0.9 |
| Alexia Putellas n 8 | 79 | 1.7 | 0.6 |
| Elene Lete n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| Mapi León n 7 | 85 | 0.3 | 0 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. Geyoro n 8 | 88.9 | 0 | 0.1 |
| D. van de Donk n 8 | 88.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Alexia Putellas n 8 | 79 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Elene Lete n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| Mapi León n 7 | 85 | 0 | 0.2 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
Birmingham City W
Birmingham City W Goalkeeper
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Saves | Goals conceded | Penalties saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Baggaley | 8 | 90720 min | 425.3 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 00 /90 |
| Player | Mins | Saves 2+3+ |
|---|---|---|
| S. Baggaley n 8 | 90 | 5.3 |
Birmingham City W Defensive
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels won | Fouls committed | Yellow cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. McKenna | 8 | 90720 min | 151.9 /90 | 121.5 /90 | 00 /90 | 415.1 /90 | 70.9 /90 | 00 /90 |
| N. Herron | 8 | 88707 min | 151.9 /90 | 192.4 /90 | 30.4 /90 | 465.9 /90 | 91.1 /90 | 10.1 /90 |
| M. Turner | 7 | 90630 min | 91.3 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 20.3 /90 | 202.9 /90 | 50.7 /90 | 00 /90 |
| S. Cooke | 4 | 71285 min | 10.3 /90 | 20.6 /90 | 20.6 /90 | 72.2 /90 | 10.3 /90 | 00 /90 |
| L. Naalsund | 8 | 84668 min | 192.6 /90 | 131.8 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 304 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 10.1 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Fouls committed 1+2+ | Fouls won 1+2+ | Likely duel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. McKenna n 8 | 90 | 0.9 | 1.9 | — |
| S. Baggaley n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0.5 | — |
| N. Herron n 8 | 88.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | — |
| L. Naalsund n 8 | 83.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | — |
| L. Crosthwaite n 8 | 82.8 | 1.9 | 0.7 | — |
| See more players · Pro | ||||
| Player | Mins | Tackles 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|
| R. McKenna n 8 | 90 | 1.9 |
| N. Herron n 8 | 88.4 | 1.9 |
| L. Naalsund n 8 | 83.5 | 2.6 |
| L. Crosthwaite n 8 | 82.8 | 0.5 |
| Lee Geum-Min n 8 | 68 | 0.7 |
| See more players · Pro | ||
Birmingham City W Attacking
| Player | Apps | Avg mins | Goals | Assists | Shots | Shots on target | Key passes | Dribbles completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Crosthwaite | 8 | 83662 min | 10.1 /90 | 10.1 /90 | 162.2 /90 | 50.7 /90 | 60.8 /90 | 60.8 /90 |
| Lee Geum-Min | 8 | 68544 min | 00 /90 | 10.2 /90 | 61 /90 | 20.3 /90 | 61 /90 | 30.5 /90 |
| W. Leidhammar | 5 | 49247 min | 10.4 /90 | 00 /90 | 51.8 /90 | 41.5 /90 | 00 /90 | 20.7 /90 |
| V. Sarri | 4 | 55218 min | 00 /90 | 00 /90 | 62.5 /90 | 00 /90 | 20.8 /90 | 10.4 /90 |
| C. Effa Effa | 3 | 3297 min | 00 /90 | 10.9 /90 | 10.9 /90 | 10.9 /90 | 21.9 /90 | 00 /90 |
| See more players · Pro | ||||||||
| Player | Mins | Shots 1+2+ | Shots on target 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. McKenna n 8 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| S. Baggaley n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| N. Herron n 8 | 88.4 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| L. Naalsund n 8 | 83.5 | 0.5 | 0 |
| L. Crosthwaite n 8 | 82.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
| Player | Mins | Goals 1+2+ | Assists 1+2+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Baggaley n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| R. McKenna n 8 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| N. Herron n 8 | 88.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| L. Naalsund n 8 | 83.5 | 0 | 0.1 |
| L. Crosthwaite n 8 | 82.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| See more players · Pro | |||
The day’s free picks, by email
Every morning at 07:30 UK: the model’s free picks, each with its confidence tier and that tier’s settled record, misses included. No tips, no guarantees, one click to leave.
Form, Head-to-Head & Standings
The numbers behind London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W — recent results, past meetings and where each side sits. (TACTIX’s model forecast is in the projections below.)
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who is predicted to win London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W?
- TACTIX’s free model pick for London City Lionesses W v Birmingham City W is Home win (best price 1.20 at Betano).
- What is the recent form of London City Lionesses W and Birmingham City W?
- Recent form — London City Lionesses W 3W 1D 1L; Birmingham City W 1W 2D 2L.
Today’s Boards
Every fixture kicking off in the UK day, and the fixtures where the free pick leads with each market.
This page is generated from TACTIX’s match data by our software and checked automatically; data as of . How it works → · Report an error
How our model works · Live track record · Predictions are model output, not betting advice.